Olympia 1863 verses Lucille Rhodes 1976 paintings analysis

Olympia 1863 verses Lucille Rhodes 1976
3 mn read

Both artists in these two paintings have used the principle of nude women in their works of art to particularly portray a number of factors such as intimation, personalize and even casualness. Both of these two works have some truth portrayed just through the principle of using sculpture of the nude woman. These two artistic works have been established to show an ultimate subjective type of message to the land of existence. It is just the fact that through this, it was just a form of nude acceptance in the context by the artist by the centuries for the sufficient exploit of the minded way. The nudeness and the women just naked is a portrait of low mind context in just two arts of work.

Olympia’s paintings are more portraying evidence of the low sensuality of womanhood as compared to Lucille Rhodes’s work of art. Olympia’s work clearly shows the recycling nude woman who is just on the bed in the portrait with just a black ribbon jut on the neck and the form of the gold type of bracelet over her wrist. This work of art portrays the surrounding of the nude woman to have accompanied by the servant, flowers of classy. This shows the revolution of the modern world and the foreshadowing of the prostitution settings.

The nude women in the painting have great hidden information which is passed across by the artists. In Olympia art, the artist presents the naked woman as adorable as possible. This is proved by the way the woman is wearing gold bracelets and surrounded by classy flowers and cats for the representation of the nude context. This portrays the refusal of the idealization of women, which reflects the undeniable well-being as much as it can. In this way, the undermining of the academic art is displayed over the lighting skin, which shows modern France. The nude woman in the second artwork by Lucille Rhodes just portrays the same nudeness, but the difference comes in fact, there is no composition of the complexities of the lying naked woman. This portrays the foundation which is underlined for the type of the New York chronically and subjectivism.

The artists have included the beds for the purpose of lying to the women, which represents the static way of the setting. Through the representation of the beds in the two paintings, it is the fact that the woman representation just surrounds the same realization idea and no more nether a shift. In Olympia art, the artist includes a lot of the woman’s support objectively by use of the cat and the classy flowers for the nudeness support. This just portrays the modem cage of the understanding of the modern light skin and how they will be on display over their respective settings. Rhodes paints show characters that will Neel over the demonstration of the real draughtsmanship. In this part of the art, there is the exposure of the clothes and gestures, which is shown by the nude woman’s personality, and the expression marks the resources perceptively in the land of Beckmann.

In my opinion, do agree that the nudeness of the women is not just the naked that the artists were trying to put across, but there was just that great message they wanted to put across. In my perspective, I just agree that although the women were naked, they did have the same setting, I mean this just as in Olympia’s work of art, the nude naked woman was just accompanied by elements to support her level of nakedness, such as cat, and classy flowers this was a representation of the way the woman is presented in the modern world just a sex model. The fact that the woman is just considered under different perspectives it’s not just all the same over all the parts of the world as just different seen in terms of the complexities over the two artistic works. From my point of view, it is not that the woman is so comfortable with the fact that she is used as just a model and satisfied of manhood but it is just due to circumstances that he is passing across for survival way.

I can see the long scar which is in the abdomen part of the woman in the Olympia art. The artist included this show the maltreatment of the woman sexually. This scar represents the challenges and maltreatment of the woman that passes through in the name of the prostitute living kind of life. The scar just shows the lowness and how the woman just has put it under pain in modern life for the purpose of just accepting all that comes over her body for the living mechanism. The scar in real life situation represents just a mechanical assault on the body. In context, the arts uses it to show us how much pain woman pass through in the modern world for a living. It’s just part of the challenges that they are passing over different geographical parts of the world just to have what they can put in their abdomen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Reading is essential for those who seek to rise above the ordinary.

MyArticles

Welcome to MyArticles, an author-oriented website. A place where words matter. Discover without further ado our countless community stories.

Build great relations

Explore all the content from MyArticle community network. Forums, Groups, Members, Posts, Social Wall and many more. You can never get tired of it!

Become a member

Get unlimited access to the best stories and articles on MyArticles, support our lovely authors and share your stories with the World.